EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/001660_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Oct 30 20:13:57 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA224872837; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 20:13:57 -0800
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mv.mv.com by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA224812832; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 20:13:52 -0800
Received: (daemon@localhost) by mv.mv.com (8.6.10/mv(b)/mem-940616) id XAA07227 for [e-mail]; Mon, 30 Oct 1995 23:07:06 -0500
Received: by fusion.mv.com (V1.16/Amiga)
    id AA00ii8; Mon, 30 Oct 95 22:48:03 EST
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 95 22:48:03 EST
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
         (from "Chris Purdie" <[e-mail]>)
         (at Mon, 30 Oct 1995 10:11:18 -0800)
X-Mailer: //\\miga Electronic Mail (AmiElm 4.159)
From: [e-mail] (Mark Thompson)
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Refraction?
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

> Does the Refractive Index value entered itself have any effect on
> rendering times? I mean, I know it takes longer then no refraction, but
> does a setting of 1.5 render faster then a setting of 2.0?

Yes, but not significantly.
     *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
     *           Mark Thompson                  [phone]    *
     *         Fusion Films, Inc.             [e-mail]  *
     * Director of Animation and Special FX                       *
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
[e-mail] (Mark Thompson) sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]